NZS 6806:2010
Acoustics - Road-traffic noise - New and altered roads
Sets out procedures and requirements for the prediction, measurement, and assessment of road traffic noise for new and substantially altered state highways and local roads. The Standard is intended to be used primarily by local authorities and road controlling authorities and seeks to promote quicker and consistent decision-making nationally regarding the management of road traffic noise. It also provides best practice guidance and advice on methods for mitigating reverse sensitivity situations and the environmental effects of noise exposure on nearby noise-sensitive activities. For the purpose of this Standard, where any project includes a mixture of new and upgraded existing roads the roading authority shall determine the relevant criteria to be applied to each section of the road for traffic noise mitigation.
| Get this standard | Prices exclude GST | |
|---|---|---|
| PDF ( Single user document) |
$288.00 NZD
|
|
| HardCopy |
$320.00 NZD
|
|
| Networkable PDF |
Price varies
|
|
| Online Library ( Annual subscription) |
Info
Price varies
Online Library subscription information Online library subscriptions provide a cost-effective solution for organisations of any size to access the latest standards, offering 24/7 access to a personalised catalogue. The service ensures subscribers have have the most up-to-date version of selected standards, incluing automatic updates for any amendments or versions. Pricing is dependent on the chosen standards and the number of concurrent users, with discounts applied from the standards PDF price. For customised subscriptions or further inquiries, contact the Online Library team. |
Committee representation
Acknowledgement
Copyright
Contents
Referenced documents
Related documents
Websites
Latest revisions
Review of Standards
Foreword
Outcome statement
1 SCOPE
1.1 GENERAL
1.2 APPLICATION
1.3 LIMITATIONS
1.4 PROTECTED PREMISES AND FACILITIES
1.5 ALTERED ROAD
1.6 NEW ROAD
1.7 ASSESSMENT POSITION
1.8 USER RESOURCES
2 INTERPRETATION
2.1 TERMINOLOGY
2.2 DEFINITIONS
2.3 SYMBOLS
2.4 ABBREVIATIONS
3 DESCRIPTION OF ROAD-TRAFFIC NOISE
3.1 DESCRIPTOR OF ROAD-TRAFFIC NOISE
3.2 NATURE OF ROAD-TRAFFIC NOISE
3.3 EFFECTS OF NOISE
3.4 SINGLE-EVENT NOISE AND QUANTIFYING TRAFFIC NOISE
4 LEGAL AND POLICY CONTEXT
4.1 INTRODUCTION
4.2 NEW ZEALAND TRANSPORT STRATEGY
4.3 LAND-USE PLANNING
4.4 LAND TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT ACT
4.5 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ACT
4.6 BUILDING ACT
4.7 HEALTH CRITERIA
5 MEASUREMENT AND PREDICTION
5.1 GENERAL
5.2 MEASUREMENTS
5.3 PREDICTION
5.4 UNCERTAINTY
6 NOISE CRITERIA
6.1 CRITERIA
6.2 SPECIAL CASES
6.3 BEST PRACTICE OPTION
7 DEVELOPMENT AND ASSESSMENT OF MITIGATION OPTIONS
7.1 USE OF PROFESSIONAL ACOUSTICIANS
7.2 NOISE ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT OF MITIGATION OPTIONS
8 MITIGATION
8.1 INTRODUCTION
8.2 STRUCTURAL MITIGATION
8.3 BUILDING MODIFICATION MITIGATION
8.4 CIRCUMSTANCES NOT REQUIRING MITIGATION
9 INFORMATION TO BE INCLUDED IN REPORTS
9.1 INTRODUCTION
9.2 TRAFFIC VOLUME AND CRITERIA
APPENDIX
APPENDIX A – NOISE MITIGATION AND ASSESSMENT
A1 INTRODUCTION
A2 EXAMPLE 1 – ALTERED ROAD – ALTERATION OF AN EXISTING ROAD IN AN URBANENVIRONMENT INVOLVING THE PROVISION OF AN ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC LANE
A3 EXAMPLE 2 – NEW ROADDEVELOPMENT OF A NEW ROAD IN A RURAL ‘GREENFIELD’ ENVIRONMENT
A4 EXAMPLE 3 – ALTERED ROAD – SPECIAL CASEDEVELOPMENT OF A NEW INTERSECTION TO CONNECT A NEW ROAD AND ANEXISTING ROAD IN A RURAL ENVIRONMENT
A5 EXAMPLE 4 – ALTERED ROADALTERATION OF AN EXISTING ROAD IN AN URBAN ENVIRONMENT INVOLVING THEREPLACEMENT OF A ROUNDABOUT WITH A SIGNALISED INTERSECTION
APPENDIX B – APPROACHES TO NOISE MANAGEMENT
B1 INTRODUCTION
APPENDIX C – DIAGRAMMATIC REPRESENTATION OF APPLYING NZS 6806
APPENDIX D – NOISE-MITIGATION BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS
D1 OVERVIEW
D2 NOISE-MITIGATION BENEFIT
D3 CALCULATION OF NOISE MITIGATION BENEFIT FOR EACH PROTECTED PREMISESOR FACILITY
D4 SPECIAL CASES
D5 NOISE-MITIGATION COST
D6 NOISE-MITIGATION BENEFIT-COST RATIO
Table
1 – Symbols for sound quantities
2 – Noise criteria
3 – Recommended number of mitigation options to be assessed
4 – Noise assessment scenarios
A1 – Example 1 – Step A2.1 Assessment details – Existing – Current roadlayout at date of assessment
A2 – Example 1 – Step A2.1 Results – Existing – Current road layout at dateof assessment
A3 – Example 1 – Step A2.2 Assessment details – Do-nothing – Current roadlayout at design year
A4 – Example 1 – Step A2.2 Results – Do-nothing – Current road layout atdesign year
A5 – Example 1 – Step A2.3 Assessment details – Do-minimum – Future roadlayout at design year without specifi c noise mitigation
A6 – Example 1 – Step A2.3 Results – Do-minimum – Future road layout atdesign year without specifi c noise mitigation
A7 – Example 1 – Step A2.4 Assessment details – Mitigation option 1 – Futureroad layout at design year with noise mitigation
A8 – Example 1 – Step A2.4 Results – Mitigation option 1 – Future road layout at design year with noise mitigation
A9 – Example 1 – Step A2.5 Assessment details – Mitigation option 2 – Futureroad layout at design year with noise mitigation
A10 – Example 1 – Step A2.5 Results – Mitigation option 2 – Future road layout at design year with noise mitigation
A11 – Example 1 – Mitigation option details
A12 – Example 1 – Comparison of mitigation options
A13 – Example 2 – Step A3.1 Results – Existing noise environment – Greenfi eldsituation at date of assessment
A14 – Example 2 – Step A3.2 Assessment details – Do-minimum noiseenvironment – New road layout at design year without specifi c noise mitigation
A15 – Example 2 – Step A3.2 Results – Do-minimum noise environment –New road layout at design year without specifi c noise mitigation
A16 – Example 2 – Step A3.3 Assessment details – Mitigation option 1 – Newroad layout at design year with noise mitigation
A17 – Example 2 – Step A3.3 Results – Mitigation option 1 – New road layout at design year with noise mitigation
A18 – Example 2 – Step A3.4 Assessment details – Mitigation option 2 – Newroad layout at design year with noise mitigation
A19 – Example 2 – Step A3.4 Results – Mitigation option 2 – New road layout at design year with structural noise mitigation
A20 – Example 2 – Mitigation option details
A21 – Example 2 – Comparison of mitigation options
A22 – Example 3 – Step A4.1 Assessment details – Existing noise environment– Current road layout at date of assessment
A23 – Example 3 – Step A4.1 – Results – Existing noise environment – Currentroad layout at date of assessment
A24 – Example 3 – Step A4.2 Assessment details – Do-nothing environment– Current road layout at design year
A25 – Example 3 – Step A4.2 Results – Do-nothing noise environment –Current road layout at design year
A26 – Example 3 – Step A4.3 Assessment details – Do-minimum noiseenvironment – New intersection at design year without specifi c noise mitigation
A27 – Example 3 – Step A4.3 Results – Do-minimum noise environment –New intersection at design year without specifi c noise mitigation
A28 – Example 3 – Step A4.4 Assessment details – Mitigation option 1 – Newroad intersection at design year with noise mitigation
A29 – Example 3 – Step A4.4 Results – Mitigation option 1 – New intersection at design year with structural noise mitigation
A30 – Example 3 – Step A4.5 Assessment details – Mitigation option 2 – Newintersection at design year with noise mitigation
A31 – Example 3 – Step A4.5 Results – Mitigation option 2 – New intersection at design year with noise mitigation
A32 – Example 3 – Step A4.5 Assessment details – Mitigation option 3 – Newintersection at design year with noise mitigation
A33 – Example 3 – Step A4.6 Results – Mitigation option 3 – New intersection at design year with noise mitigation
A34 – Example 3 – Mitigation option details
A35 – Example 3 – Comparison of mitigation options
A36 – Example 4 – Step A5.1 Assessment details – Existing noise environment– Current road layout at date of assessment
A37 – Example 4 – Step A5.1 Results – Existing noise environment – Currentroad layout at date of assessment
A38 – Example 4 – Step A5.2 Assessment details – Do-nothing noiseenvironment – Current road layout at design year
A39 – Example 4 – Step A5.2 Results – Do-nothing noise environment –Current road layout at design year
A40 – Example 4 – Step A5.3 Assessment details – Do-minimum noiseenvironment – Future road layout at design year without specifi c noise mitigation
A41 – Example 4 – Step A5.3 Schematic representation – Do-minimum noiseenvironment – Future road layout at design year without specifi c noise mitigation
A42 – Example 4 – Step A5.4 Assessment details – Mitigation option 1 –Future road layout at design year with noise mitigation
A43 – Example 4 – Step A5.4 Results – Mitigation option 1 – Future road layout at design year with noise mitigation
A44 – Example 4 – Step A5.5 Assessment details – Mitigation option 2 –Future road layout at design year with noise mitigation
A45 – Example 4 – Step A5.5 Results – Mitigation option 2 – Future road layout at design year with noise mitigation
A46 – Example 4 – Step A5.6 Assessment details – Mitigation option 3 –Future road layout at design year with noise mitigation
A47 – Example 4 – Step A5.6 Results – Mitigation option 3 – Future road layout at design year with noise mitigation
A48 – Example 4 – Mitigation option details
A49 – Example 4 – Comparison of mitigation options
B1 – Approaches to noise management – Mitigation options
B2 – Approaches to noise management – Planning process
D1 – Benefit of noise mitigation undertaken on new road project at dwelling 1
D2 – Benefi t of noise mitigation undertaken on new road project at dwelling 1with building modifi cation mitigation
D3 – Benefi t of noise mitigation undertaken on altered road project at dwelling 2
D4 – Indicative noise-mitigation costs (planning, design, and construction) – 2008
Figure
C1.1 – Examples of assessment and measurement positions
A1 – Example 1 – Step A2.1 – Schematic representation – Existing – Currentroad layout at date of assessment
A2 – Example 1 – Step A2.2 – Schematic representation – Do-nothing –Current road layout at design year
A3 – Example 1 – Step A2.3 – Schematic representation – Do-minimum –Future road layout at design year without specifi c noise mitigation
A4 – Example 1 – Step A2.4 – Schematic representation – Mitigation option 1 –Future road layout at design year with noise mitigation
A5 – Example 1 – Step A2.5 – Schematic representation – Mitigation option 2 –Future road layout at design year with noise mitigation
A6 – Example 2 – Step A3.1 – Schematic representation – Existing noiseenvironment – Greenfi eld situation at date of assessment
A7 – Example 2 – Step A3.2 – Schematic representation – Do-minimum noiseenvironment – New road layout at design year without specifi c noise mitigation
A8 – Example 2 – Step A3.3 – Schematic representation – Mitigation option 1 –New road layout at design year with noise mitigation
A9 – Example 2 – Step A3.4 – Schematic representation – Mitigation option 2 –New road layout at design year with noise mitigation
A10 – Example 3 – Step A4.1 – Schematic representation – Existing noiseenvironment – Current road layout at date of assessment
A11 – Example 3 – Step A4.2 – Schematic representation – Do-nothing noiseenvironment – Current road layout at design year
A12 – Example 3 – Step A4.3 – Schematic representation – Do-minimumnoise environment – New intersection at design year without specifi c noisemitigation
A13 – Example 3 – Step A4.4 – Schematic representation – Mitigation option 1 –New intersection at design year with noise mitigation
A14 – Example 3 – Step A4.5 – Schematic representation – Mitigation option 2 –New intersection at design year with noise mitigation
A15 – Example 3 – Step A4.6 – Schematic representation – Mitigation option 3 –New intersection at design year with noise mitigation
A16 – Example 4 – Step A5.1 – Schematic representation – Existing noiseenvironment – Current road layout at date of assessment
A17 – Example 4 – Step A5.2 – Schematic representation – Do-nothing noiseenvironment – Current road layout at design year
A18 – Example 4 – Step A5.3 – Schematic representation – Do-minimumnoise environment – Future road layout at design year without specifi c noisemitigation
A19 – Example 4 – Step A5.4 – Schematic representation – Mitigation option 1 –Future road layout at design year with noise mitigation
A20 – Example 4 – Step A5.5 – Schematic representation – Mitigation option 2 –Future road layout at design year with noise mitigation
A21 – Example 4 – Step A5.6 – Schematic representation – Mitigation option 3 –Future road layout at design year with noise mitigation
C1 – Determining if NZS 6806 applies
C2 – Determining noise criteria and mitigation measures
STANDARDS COUNCIL
Keep me up-to-date
Sign up to receive updates when there are changes to this standard
References
Acoustics - Recommended design sound levels and reverberation times for building interiors
Related Information
Similar Standards
-
BS 3539:1986
Specification for sound level meters for the measurement of noise emitted by motor vehicles
-
BS 6086:1981
Method of measurement of noise inside motor vehicles
-
BS EN 12053:2001+A1:2008
Safety of industrial trucks. Test methods for measuring noise emissions
-
BS EN 14389:2023
Road traffic noise reducing devices. Procedures for assessing long term performance
Committee representation
Acknowledgement
Copyright
Contents
Referenced documents
Related documents
Websites
Latest revisions
Review of Standards
Foreword
Outcome statement
1 SCOPE
1.1 GENERAL
1.2 APPLICATION
1.3 LIMITATIONS
1.4 PROTECTED PREMISES AND FACILITIES
1.5 ALTERED ROAD
1.6 NEW ROAD
1.7 ASSESSMENT POSITION
1.8 USER RESOURCES
2 INTERPRETATION
2.1 TERMINOLOGY
2.2 DEFINITIONS
2.3 SYMBOLS
2.4 ABBREVIATIONS
3 DESCRIPTION OF ROAD-TRAFFIC NOISE
3.1 DESCRIPTOR OF ROAD-TRAFFIC NOISE
3.2 NATURE OF ROAD-TRAFFIC NOISE
3.3 EFFECTS OF NOISE
3.4 SINGLE-EVENT NOISE AND QUANTIFYING TRAFFIC NOISE
4 LEGAL AND POLICY CONTEXT
4.1 INTRODUCTION
4.2 NEW ZEALAND TRANSPORT STRATEGY
4.3 LAND-USE PLANNING
4.4 LAND TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT ACT
4.5 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ACT
4.6 BUILDING ACT
4.7 HEALTH CRITERIA
5 MEASUREMENT AND PREDICTION
5.1 GENERAL
5.2 MEASUREMENTS
5.3 PREDICTION
5.4 UNCERTAINTY
6 NOISE CRITERIA
6.1 CRITERIA
6.2 SPECIAL CASES
6.3 BEST PRACTICE OPTION
7 DEVELOPMENT AND ASSESSMENT OF MITIGATION OPTIONS
7.1 USE OF PROFESSIONAL ACOUSTICIANS
7.2 NOISE ASSESSMENT AND DEVELOPMENT OF MITIGATION OPTIONS
8 MITIGATION
8.1 INTRODUCTION
8.2 STRUCTURAL MITIGATION
8.3 BUILDING MODIFICATION MITIGATION
8.4 CIRCUMSTANCES NOT REQUIRING MITIGATION
9 INFORMATION TO BE INCLUDED IN REPORTS
9.1 INTRODUCTION
9.2 TRAFFIC VOLUME AND CRITERIA
APPENDIX
APPENDIX A – NOISE MITIGATION AND ASSESSMENT
A1 INTRODUCTION
A2 EXAMPLE 1 – ALTERED ROAD – ALTERATION OF AN EXISTING ROAD IN AN URBANENVIRONMENT INVOLVING THE PROVISION OF AN ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC LANE
A3 EXAMPLE 2 – NEW ROADDEVELOPMENT OF A NEW ROAD IN A RURAL ‘GREENFIELD’ ENVIRONMENT
A4 EXAMPLE 3 – ALTERED ROAD – SPECIAL CASEDEVELOPMENT OF A NEW INTERSECTION TO CONNECT A NEW ROAD AND ANEXISTING ROAD IN A RURAL ENVIRONMENT
A5 EXAMPLE 4 – ALTERED ROADALTERATION OF AN EXISTING ROAD IN AN URBAN ENVIRONMENT INVOLVING THEREPLACEMENT OF A ROUNDABOUT WITH A SIGNALISED INTERSECTION
APPENDIX B – APPROACHES TO NOISE MANAGEMENT
B1 INTRODUCTION
APPENDIX C – DIAGRAMMATIC REPRESENTATION OF APPLYING NZS 6806
APPENDIX D – NOISE-MITIGATION BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS
D1 OVERVIEW
D2 NOISE-MITIGATION BENEFIT
D3 CALCULATION OF NOISE MITIGATION BENEFIT FOR EACH PROTECTED PREMISESOR FACILITY
D4 SPECIAL CASES
D5 NOISE-MITIGATION COST
D6 NOISE-MITIGATION BENEFIT-COST RATIO
Table
1 – Symbols for sound quantities
2 – Noise criteria
3 – Recommended number of mitigation options to be assessed
4 – Noise assessment scenarios
A1 – Example 1 – Step A2.1 Assessment details – Existing – Current roadlayout at date of assessment
A2 – Example 1 – Step A2.1 Results – Existing – Current road layout at dateof assessment
A3 – Example 1 – Step A2.2 Assessment details – Do-nothing – Current roadlayout at design year
A4 – Example 1 – Step A2.2 Results – Do-nothing – Current road layout atdesign year
A5 – Example 1 – Step A2.3 Assessment details – Do-minimum – Future roadlayout at design year without specifi c noise mitigation
A6 – Example 1 – Step A2.3 Results – Do-minimum – Future road layout atdesign year without specifi c noise mitigation
A7 – Example 1 – Step A2.4 Assessment details – Mitigation option 1 – Futureroad layout at design year with noise mitigation
A8 – Example 1 – Step A2.4 Results – Mitigation option 1 – Future road layout at design year with noise mitigation
A9 – Example 1 – Step A2.5 Assessment details – Mitigation option 2 – Futureroad layout at design year with noise mitigation
A10 – Example 1 – Step A2.5 Results – Mitigation option 2 – Future road layout at design year with noise mitigation
A11 – Example 1 – Mitigation option details
A12 – Example 1 – Comparison of mitigation options
A13 – Example 2 – Step A3.1 Results – Existing noise environment – Greenfi eldsituation at date of assessment
A14 – Example 2 – Step A3.2 Assessment details – Do-minimum noiseenvironment – New road layout at design year without specifi c noise mitigation
A15 – Example 2 – Step A3.2 Results – Do-minimum noise environment –New road layout at design year without specifi c noise mitigation
A16 – Example 2 – Step A3.3 Assessment details – Mitigation option 1 – Newroad layout at design year with noise mitigation
A17 – Example 2 – Step A3.3 Results – Mitigation option 1 – New road layout at design year with noise mitigation
A18 – Example 2 – Step A3.4 Assessment details – Mitigation option 2 – Newroad layout at design year with noise mitigation
A19 – Example 2 – Step A3.4 Results – Mitigation option 2 – New road layout at design year with structural noise mitigation
A20 – Example 2 – Mitigation option details
A21 – Example 2 – Comparison of mitigation options
A22 – Example 3 – Step A4.1 Assessment details – Existing noise environment– Current road layout at date of assessment
A23 – Example 3 – Step A4.1 – Results – Existing noise environment – Currentroad layout at date of assessment
A24 – Example 3 – Step A4.2 Assessment details – Do-nothing environment– Current road layout at design year
A25 – Example 3 – Step A4.2 Results – Do-nothing noise environment –Current road layout at design year
A26 – Example 3 – Step A4.3 Assessment details – Do-minimum noiseenvironment – New intersection at design year without specifi c noise mitigation
A27 – Example 3 – Step A4.3 Results – Do-minimum noise environment –New intersection at design year without specifi c noise mitigation
A28 – Example 3 – Step A4.4 Assessment details – Mitigation option 1 – Newroad intersection at design year with noise mitigation
A29 – Example 3 – Step A4.4 Results – Mitigation option 1 – New intersection at design year with structural noise mitigation
A30 – Example 3 – Step A4.5 Assessment details – Mitigation option 2 – Newintersection at design year with noise mitigation
A31 – Example 3 – Step A4.5 Results – Mitigation option 2 – New intersection at design year with noise mitigation
A32 – Example 3 – Step A4.5 Assessment details – Mitigation option 3 – Newintersection at design year with noise mitigation
A33 – Example 3 – Step A4.6 Results – Mitigation option 3 – New intersection at design year with noise mitigation
A34 – Example 3 – Mitigation option details
A35 – Example 3 – Comparison of mitigation options
A36 – Example 4 – Step A5.1 Assessment details – Existing noise environment– Current road layout at date of assessment
A37 – Example 4 – Step A5.1 Results – Existing noise environment – Currentroad layout at date of assessment
A38 – Example 4 – Step A5.2 Assessment details – Do-nothing noiseenvironment – Current road layout at design year
A39 – Example 4 – Step A5.2 Results – Do-nothing noise environment –Current road layout at design year
A40 – Example 4 – Step A5.3 Assessment details – Do-minimum noiseenvironment – Future road layout at design year without specifi c noise mitigation
A41 – Example 4 – Step A5.3 Schematic representation – Do-minimum noiseenvironment – Future road layout at design year without specifi c noise mitigation
A42 – Example 4 – Step A5.4 Assessment details – Mitigation option 1 –Future road layout at design year with noise mitigation
A43 – Example 4 – Step A5.4 Results – Mitigation option 1 – Future road layout at design year with noise mitigation
A44 – Example 4 – Step A5.5 Assessment details – Mitigation option 2 –Future road layout at design year with noise mitigation
A45 – Example 4 – Step A5.5 Results – Mitigation option 2 – Future road layout at design year with noise mitigation
A46 – Example 4 – Step A5.6 Assessment details – Mitigation option 3 –Future road layout at design year with noise mitigation
A47 – Example 4 – Step A5.6 Results – Mitigation option 3 – Future road layout at design year with noise mitigation
A48 – Example 4 – Mitigation option details
A49 – Example 4 – Comparison of mitigation options
B1 – Approaches to noise management – Mitigation options
B2 – Approaches to noise management – Planning process
D1 – Benefit of noise mitigation undertaken on new road project at dwelling 1
D2 – Benefi t of noise mitigation undertaken on new road project at dwelling 1with building modifi cation mitigation
D3 – Benefi t of noise mitigation undertaken on altered road project at dwelling 2
D4 – Indicative noise-mitigation costs (planning, design, and construction) – 2008
Figure
C1.1 – Examples of assessment and measurement positions
A1 – Example 1 – Step A2.1 – Schematic representation – Existing – Currentroad layout at date of assessment
A2 – Example 1 – Step A2.2 – Schematic representation – Do-nothing –Current road layout at design year
A3 – Example 1 – Step A2.3 – Schematic representation – Do-minimum –Future road layout at design year without specifi c noise mitigation
A4 – Example 1 – Step A2.4 – Schematic representation – Mitigation option 1 –Future road layout at design year with noise mitigation
A5 – Example 1 – Step A2.5 – Schematic representation – Mitigation option 2 –Future road layout at design year with noise mitigation
A6 – Example 2 – Step A3.1 – Schematic representation – Existing noiseenvironment – Greenfi eld situation at date of assessment
A7 – Example 2 – Step A3.2 – Schematic representation – Do-minimum noiseenvironment – New road layout at design year without specifi c noise mitigation
A8 – Example 2 – Step A3.3 – Schematic representation – Mitigation option 1 –New road layout at design year with noise mitigation
A9 – Example 2 – Step A3.4 – Schematic representation – Mitigation option 2 –New road layout at design year with noise mitigation
A10 – Example 3 – Step A4.1 – Schematic representation – Existing noiseenvironment – Current road layout at date of assessment
A11 – Example 3 – Step A4.2 – Schematic representation – Do-nothing noiseenvironment – Current road layout at design year
A12 – Example 3 – Step A4.3 – Schematic representation – Do-minimumnoise environment – New intersection at design year without specifi c noisemitigation
A13 – Example 3 – Step A4.4 – Schematic representation – Mitigation option 1 –New intersection at design year with noise mitigation
A14 – Example 3 – Step A4.5 – Schematic representation – Mitigation option 2 –New intersection at design year with noise mitigation
A15 – Example 3 – Step A4.6 – Schematic representation – Mitigation option 3 –New intersection at design year with noise mitigation
A16 – Example 4 – Step A5.1 – Schematic representation – Existing noiseenvironment – Current road layout at date of assessment
A17 – Example 4 – Step A5.2 – Schematic representation – Do-nothing noiseenvironment – Current road layout at design year
A18 – Example 4 – Step A5.3 – Schematic representation – Do-minimumnoise environment – Future road layout at design year without specifi c noisemitigation
A19 – Example 4 – Step A5.4 – Schematic representation – Mitigation option 1 –Future road layout at design year with noise mitigation
A20 – Example 4 – Step A5.5 – Schematic representation – Mitigation option 2 –Future road layout at design year with noise mitigation
A21 – Example 4 – Step A5.6 – Schematic representation – Mitigation option 3 –Future road layout at design year with noise mitigation
C1 – Determining if NZS 6806 applies
C2 – Determining noise criteria and mitigation measures
STANDARDS COUNCIL
NZS 6806:2010
Online Library subscription information
Online library subscriptions provide a cost-effective solution for organisations of any size to access the latest standards, offering 24/7 access to a personalised catalogue. The service ensures subscribers have have the most up-to-date version of selected standards, incluing automatic updates for any amendments or versions. Pricing is dependent on the chosen standards and the number of concurrent users, with discounts applied from the standards PDF price. For customised subscriptions or further inquiries, contact the Online Library team.